A Next.js workspace and BFF keep matters isolated behind typed contracts. Matter-scoped AI operations authorize access before loading per-matter credentials or model services.
Active · Legal evidence system
Legal work withthe evidence attached.
OKI Legal turns case documents into cited answers, review tables, workflows, and auditable decisions while keeping human review in control.

The operating question
How can legal teams use AI without separating a conclusion from the document that supports it?
The situation
Start with the real operation.
Evidence is often fragmented across files, manual review, spreadsheets, and institutional memory.
Opaque automation can omit a relevant passage, invent certainty, or turn a proposed interpretation into an unauthorized decision.
The system
Keep evidence beside action.
OKI Legal is an agentic legal workspace for matters in Brazil and the United States.
It connects a document vault, cited answers, review tables, contract analysis, workflows, history, playbooks, and recovery-judicial operations without detaching a conclusion from the source that supports it.
Retrieval keeps the cited passage and its location beside the answer. Review cells preserve their source, reconciliation is deterministic and versioned, and AI extracts or proposes while authorized people review and decide.
Interface evidence
See the system, not a substitute for it.



Where it stands
Active
OKI Legal is an active private product. Access is provisioned deliberately rather than offered through public sign-up.
The current workspace includes cited document assistance, review tables, workflows, history, contract intelligence, and an active-case recovery-judicial surface. Public filing, protocol, and publication remain outside this site.
04 / Limits
Human and technical boundaries stay visible.
AI extracts and proposes; authorized people decide. Automatic filing, protocol, and publication are outside this public surface.
Continue